Triple

T26254399
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject McLaughlin group E656679 entity
Predicate hasMaximalSubgroup P76335 FINISHED
Object U4(3) NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: U4(3) | Statement: [McLaughlin group, hasMaximalSubgroup, U4(3)]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasMaximalSubgroup
Context triple: [McLaughlin group, hasMaximalSubgroup, U4(3)]
  • A. hasMaximalSubgroupOrder
    Indicates that the subgroup in question has the greatest possible order (size) among all proper subgroups of the given group.
  • B. isMaximalSubgroupOf chosen
    Indicates that one group is a proper subgroup of another that is not contained in any larger proper subgroup of that group.
  • C. hasMaximalCompactSubgroupOf
    Indicates that one mathematical group is the maximal compact subgroup contained within another group.
  • D. hasNormalSubgroup
    Indicates that one group is a normal subgroup of another group, meaning it is invariant under conjugation by elements of the larger group.
  • E. isFullyInvariantSubgroup
    Indicates that a subgroup remains invariant under all endomorphisms of the parent group, not just its automorphisms.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ee5b4d25ac819086acb51184602576 completed April 26, 2026, 6:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fd02680d948190a3463fb119ba8556 completed May 7, 2026, 9:21 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fcf89c69b4819082bbc564bd15137d completed May 7, 2026, 8:39 p.m.
Created at: April 26, 2026, 9:08 p.m.