Triple

T26253925
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject E8 lattice E656669 entity
Predicate hasRootsOfNorm P168913 FINISHED
Object 2 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 2 | Statement: [E8 lattice, hasRootsOfNorm, 2]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasRootsOfNorm
Context triple: [E8 lattice, hasRootsOfNorm, 2]
  • A. containsRootsOfUnity
    Indicates that one mathematical object includes all elements that are roots of unity within a specified context or structure.
  • B. hasMinimalPolynomialOverQ
    Indicates that one element is the minimal polynomial over the rational numbers ℚ of another element, i.e., the monic irreducible polynomial in ℚ[x] for which that element is a root.
  • C. hasRootSystem
    Indicates that one entity possesses or is characterized by a particular type of root system.
  • D. isRootOf
    Indicates that one entity is the root or origin point from which another entity directly or indirectly descends or is derived.
  • E. hasAssociatedPolynomial
    Indicates that one entity is linked to another entity that serves as its associated polynomial, typically representing or characterizing some of its properties or behavior.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ee5b4d25ac819086acb51184602576 completed April 26, 2026, 6:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f67866e9248190b7ba218f9ca2ae8d completed May 2, 2026, 10:19 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f675fd59608190b246383435e68fce completed May 2, 2026, 10:09 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f676c35f3481909b9ba18a5662d6ce completed May 2, 2026, 10:12 p.m.
Created at: April 26, 2026, 9:08 p.m.