Triple

T2624305
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Mahayana sutras E59080 entity
Predicate laterWrittenDownAs P42299 FINISHED
Object manuscripts LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: manuscripts | Statement: [Mahayana sutras, laterWrittenDownAs, manuscripts]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: laterWrittenDownAs
Context triple: [Mahayana sutras, laterWrittenDownAs, manuscripts]
  • A. laterWrittenDownIn
    Indicates that information, events, or content were recorded or documented at a later time than when they originally occurred or were created.
  • B. laterWrittenIn
    Indicates that one text or version was written at a later time than another, establishing a chronological order between the writings.
  • C. likelyWrittenFrom
    Indicates that something (such as a text, statement, or perspective) is probably authored or expressed from the viewpoint, context, or position of a particular entity.
  • D. areWrittenOn
    Indicates that one entity serves as a surface or medium on which another entity is inscribed, recorded, or written.
  • E. wroteIn
    Indicates that an entity authored or composed something using a particular language, medium, or writing system.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ab4ac558388190962492cd2e1b0ce6 completed March 6, 2026, 9:44 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abdaca581881908fe8d3d820f839b7 completed March 7, 2026, 7:59 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abd80f48888190afdf7e3e042157d0 completed March 7, 2026, 7:47 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69abdac82b688190886a6ec2d6e2abc7 completed March 7, 2026, 7:59 a.m.
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:50 p.m.