Triple
T2623841
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Fox language |
E59069
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasDialect |
P4251
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Sauk dialect |
E93462
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Sauk dialect | Statement: [Fox language, hasDialect, Sauk dialect]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Sauk dialect Context triple: [Fox language, hasDialect, Sauk dialect]
-
A.
Wipukpa dialect
The Wipukpa dialect is a regional variety of the Yavapai language traditionally spoken by a subgroup of the Yavapai people in central Arizona.
-
B.
Sauk language
chosen
The Sauk language is an Algonquian Indigenous language of North America traditionally spoken by the Sauk (Sac) people, closely related to the Fox and Kickapoo languages and now critically endangered.
-
C.
Doabi dialect
The Doabi dialect is a regional variety of Punjabi traditionally spoken in the Doaba region of the Indian state of Punjab, between the Beas and Sutlej rivers.
-
D.
Dakota language
The Dakota language is a Siouan language spoken by the Dakota (Eastern Sioux) people of the Northern Plains region of North America.
-
E.
Osage language
The Osage language is a Siouan language traditionally spoken by the Osage people of the central United States, now the focus of revitalization and preservation efforts.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ab4ac558388190962492cd2e1b0ce6 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 9:44 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abd8af06fc8190ab48d746b8c8892b |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:50 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69af909b7d9881908930a98d004998fb |
completed | March 10, 2026, 3:31 a.m. |
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:50 p.m.