Triple
T2621624
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Texas Supreme Court |
E59020
|
entity |
| Predicate | isHighestCourtFor |
P6120
|
FINISHED |
| Object | civil cases in Texas |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: civil cases in Texas | Statement: [Texas Supreme Court, isHighestCourtFor, civil cases in Texas]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isHighestCourtFor Context triple: [Texas Supreme Court, isHighestCourtFor, civil cases in Texas]
-
A.
highestCourtOf
chosen
Indicates that one entity is the supreme judicial authority or top-level court within the jurisdiction or legal system of another entity.
-
B.
isMajorCourtIn
Indicates that a court is a primary or high-level judicial body within the specified jurisdiction or region.
-
C.
officeHoldsInHighestCourtOf
Indicates that an entity holds an official position or role within the highest court of a specified jurisdiction.
-
D.
hasAppellateJurisdictionIn
Indicates that one legal authority has the power to review and decide appeals arising from cases within a specified court, region, or jurisdiction.
-
E.
originalJurisdictionOfHighCourt
Indicates that a particular matter or case falls within the High Court’s original jurisdiction to hear and decide it as a court of first instance.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ab4ac558388190962492cd2e1b0ce6 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 9:44 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abdaca581881908fe8d3d820f839b7 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:59 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abd80f48888190afdf7e3e042157d0 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:47 a.m. |
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:50 p.m.