Triple
T26212932
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Gwen B. Sancar |
E655537
|
entity |
| Predicate | partnerInScienceWith |
P61038
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Aziz Sancar |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Aziz Sancar | Statement: [Gwen B. Sancar, partnerInScienceWith, Aziz Sancar]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: partnerInScienceWith Context triple: [Gwen B. Sancar, partnerInScienceWith, Aziz Sancar]
-
A.
partnerInScienceLegacy
Indicates a collaborative relationship where entities jointly contribute to, share in, or are associated with a lasting scientific legacy.
-
B.
partnerInStudyWith
chosen
Indicates that two entities are collaborators or co-participants in the same study or research project.
-
C.
partnerInWorkOf
Indicates a collaborative relationship where one entity works together with another on a shared task, project, or professional activity.
-
D.
projectPartners
Indicates that two or more entities collaborate together as partners on the same project.
-
E.
frequentlyCollaboratedWith
Indicates that two entities have worked together on shared activities or projects on a recurring or regular basis.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ee5b49adb4819086545280d4ef6337 |
completed | April 26, 2026, 6:36 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6247480cc8190a887eedaeb94615c |
completed | May 2, 2026, 4:21 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f623a7539c8190b71797f583da9f63 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 4:17 p.m. |
Created at: April 26, 2026, 8:53 p.m.