Triple
T26212576
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Zen 3 |
E655526
|
entity |
| Predicate | coreComplexDesign |
P160050
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 8-core CCX |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 8-core CCX | Statement: [Zen 3, coreComplexDesign, 8-core CCX]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: coreComplexDesign Context triple: [Zen 3, coreComplexDesign, 8-core CCX]
-
A.
featuresComplexCompositions
Indicates that the subject includes or presents compositions that are intricate, multi-layered, or structurally sophisticated.
-
B.
structuralDesign
Indicates the relationship in which an entity is responsible for planning, organizing, or defining the structural configuration or framework of another entity.
-
C.
coreConstruct
Indicates a fundamental building or organizing relationship where one entity serves as the essential basis or primary component from which another entity is formed or structured.
-
D.
parallelDesignTo
Indicates that one design is parallel or analogous to another in structure, function, or conceptual approach.
-
E.
hasComplex
Indicates that one entity possesses, is associated with, or is part of a larger composite structure or complex formed with another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ee5b49adb4819086545280d4ef6337 |
completed | April 26, 2026, 6:36 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f60d1804548190ab0bba3376f28269 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 2:41 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f5b007ec1c819092e2c3605933f60b |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:04 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f5f6b32a8881909baa0db57b80d56a |
completed | May 2, 2026, 1:05 p.m. |
Created at: April 26, 2026, 8:53 p.m.