Triple
T26210821
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Munda rebellion |
E655481
|
entity |
| Predicate | meaningOfAlternativeName |
P78862
|
FINISHED |
| Object | The Great Tumult |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: The Great Tumult | Statement: [Munda rebellion, meaningOfAlternativeName, The Great Tumult]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: meaningOfAlternativeName Context triple: [Munda rebellion, meaningOfAlternativeName, The Great Tumult]
-
A.
alternativeNameMeaning
chosen
Indicates that one entity expresses the meaning or interpretation of an alternative name used for another entity.
-
B.
hasAlternativeToponymy
Indicates that an entity is associated with one or more alternative place names or toponyms used to refer to the same geographic location.
-
C.
formerNameMeaning
Indicates that the meaning or interpretation of an entity’s previous name is being specified.
-
D.
isMeaningOfName
Indicates that one entity expresses or defines the meaning or interpretation of a given name.
-
E.
haveAlternativeTitle
Indicates that an entity is known by one or more alternative titles or names in addition to its primary title.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ee5b49adb4819086545280d4ef6337 |
completed | April 26, 2026, 6:36 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f60d1706d481908ca3c7c39ba0d157 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 2:41 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f5f7fd90fc81909055b211368f9139 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 1:11 p.m. |
Created at: April 26, 2026, 8:52 p.m.