Triple
T26201629
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | High Courts of Pakistan |
E655243
|
entity |
| Predicate | reviewOfAdministrativeAction |
P75620
|
FINISHED |
| Object | yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [High Courts of Pakistan, reviewOfAdministrativeAction, yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: reviewOfAdministrativeAction Context triple: [High Courts of Pakistan, reviewOfAdministrativeAction, yes]
-
A.
administrativeOutcome
Indicates the result or consequence of an administrative process, decision, or action taken by an authority.
-
B.
coveredAdministrationOf
Indicates that one entity is responsible for managing or overseeing another entity under a protective or supervisory arrangement.
-
C.
administrativeProcess
Indicates a formal, structured set of administrative actions or procedures carried out to manage, regulate, or decide on a matter within an organization or institution.
-
D.
courtReview
chosen
Indicates that a court formally examines a decision, action, or case to determine its legality, correctness, or appropriateness.
-
E.
coveredAdministration
Indicates that an administration or management activity is included within the scope or protection defined by a particular policy, agreement, or arrangement.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ee5b48236c81908fe385b6afc4f60b |
completed | April 26, 2026, 6:36 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f60cdba6248190b34176bc568e7697 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 2:40 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f60b874cc88190a487230abb69efea |
completed | May 2, 2026, 2:34 p.m. |
Created at: April 26, 2026, 8:48 p.m.