Triple
T26191708
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ring 1 (Oslo) |
E654980
|
entity |
| Predicate | isInnerRelativeTo |
P59963
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Ring 3 (Oslo) |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Ring 3 (Oslo) | Statement: [Ring 1 (Oslo), isInnerRelativeTo, Ring 3 (Oslo)]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isInnerRelativeTo Context triple: [Ring 1 (Oslo), isInnerRelativeTo, Ring 3 (Oslo)]
-
A.
isRelativeTo
Indicates that one entity has a familial or kinship relationship to another entity.
-
B.
isInnerMoonRelativeTo
Indicates that one celestial body orbits closer to the central object than another, making it the inner moon relative to the other body.
-
C.
isRelatively
Indicates that one entity is being described, measured, or evaluated in relation to another entity or reference point, rather than in absolute terms.
-
D.
hasRelativeLocation
Indicates that one entity is positioned in space in relation to another entity’s location.
-
E.
borderIsInternalTo
chosen
Indicates that the boundary or border of one entity lies entirely within the interior of another entity, without crossing or extending outside it.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ee5b469bc081908fe486453fdad810 |
completed | April 26, 2026, 6:36 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f60ca35e808190b5ec91d212f10cf3 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 2:39 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f602d07590819085ac34b189613104 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 1:57 p.m. |
Created at: April 26, 2026, 8:44 p.m.