Triple

T2618661
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject South Carolina v. Katzenbach E58950 entity
Predicate isRelatedCase P3137 FINISHED
Object Katzenbach v. Morgan E87994 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Katzenbach v. Morgan | Statement: [South Carolina v. Katzenbach, isRelatedCase, Katzenbach v. Morgan]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Katzenbach v. Morgan
Context triple: [South Carolina v. Katzenbach, isRelatedCase, Katzenbach v. Morgan]
  • A. Katzenbach v. Morgan chosen
    Katzenbach v. Morgan is a 1966 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld Congress’s power under the Fourteenth Amendment to prohibit certain state voting restrictions, reinforcing federal authority to protect voting rights.
  • B. Katzenbach v. McClung
    Katzenbach v. McClung is a 1964 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the federal government’s power to prohibit racial discrimination in local restaurants under the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
  • C. South Carolina v. Katzenbach
    South Carolina v. Katzenbach is a 1966 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the constitutionality of key provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, affirming broad federal power to combat racial discrimination in voting.
  • D. Bolling v. Sharpe
    Bolling v. Sharpe is a 1954 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racial segregation in Washington, D.C. public schools unconstitutional under the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
  • E. Nixon v. Fitzgerald
    Nixon v. Fitzgerald is a 1982 U.S. Supreme Court case that established absolute immunity from civil damages liability for a President’s official acts.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ab4ac444dc819099614e534dd6021f completed March 6, 2026, 9:44 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abdd1ca0248190aa15f80b2798524e completed March 7, 2026, 8:09 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69af98b50fa08190abe65b53081cb06b completed March 10, 2026, 4:06 a.m.
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:50 p.m.