Triple

T2618637
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject South Carolina v. Katzenbach E58950 entity
Predicate upheldProvision P1123 FINISHED
Object Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 E287803 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 | Statement: [South Carolina v. Katzenbach, upheldProvision, Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965
Context triple: [South Carolina v. Katzenbach, upheldProvision, Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965]
  • A. Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act chosen
    Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act is a key provision that required certain jurisdictions with histories of racial discrimination in voting to obtain federal approval, or “preclearance,” before changing their voting laws or practices.
  • B. Section 3(c) of the Voting Rights Act of 1965
    Section 3(c) of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 is a “bail-in” provision that allows federal courts to place jurisdictions with proven intentional voting discrimination under preclearance requirements for changes to their election laws.
  • C. Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act
    Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act was the provision that established the coverage formula determining which jurisdictions were subject to federal preclearance requirements for changes to their voting laws.
  • D. Section 203 of the Voting Rights Act
    Section 203 of the Voting Rights Act is a federal provision that requires certain jurisdictions to provide bilingual election materials and language assistance to protect the voting rights of citizens with limited English proficiency.
  • E. Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act
    Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act is a key federal provision that prohibits voting practices or procedures that discriminate on the basis of race, color, or membership in certain language minority groups.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ab4ac444dc819099614e534dd6021f completed March 6, 2026, 9:44 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abd8962b348190a059519778ea4dba completed March 7, 2026, 7:49 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69afc6352520819095eb04819578c1ba completed March 10, 2026, 7:20 a.m.
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:50 p.m.