Triple
T26176695
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | AF |
E654561
|
entity |
| Predicate | canBePushedToStack |
P168559
|
FINISHED |
| Object | yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [AF, canBePushedToStack, yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canBePushedToStack Context triple: [AF, canBePushedToStack, yes]
-
A.
canBePushedForwardAlong
Indicates that something is capable of being transferred or mapped forward along a specified function, morphism, or direction while preserving the relevant structure or properties.
-
B.
canBeAddedTo
Indicates that one entity is capable of being combined or incorporated with another entity, typically without conflict or incompatibility.
-
C.
supportsStateStack
Indicates that one entity provides or maintains a stack-based mechanism for storing, managing, and restoring multiple states over time.
-
D.
canBePassedTo
Indicates that one entity is capable of being transferred, handed over, or given to another entity.
-
E.
hasAlternativeStack
Indicates that an entity is associated with a different or substitute stack configuration or implementation that can be used in place of the primary one.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ee5b45873c81909499203612d05d07 |
completed | April 26, 2026, 6:36 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f67595fa7c8190b6e9f7a8c700dd97 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 10:07 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f673c2f81c8190bf369226306eef09 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 9:59 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f674df80b08190adb7f7531083bbb1 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 10:04 p.m. |
Created at: April 26, 2026, 8:38 p.m.