Triple
T26176653
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Zilog |
E654560
|
entity |
| Predicate | Z80UsedIn |
P31514
|
FINISHED |
| Object | CP/M-based systems |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: CP/M-based systems | Statement: [Zilog, Z80UsedIn, CP/M-based systems]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: Z80UsedIn Context triple: [Zilog, Z80UsedIn, CP/M-based systems]
-
A.
usedWithChipsetsFrom
Indicates that something is designed or suitable to be used together with specific chipsets from a given manufacturer or family.
-
B.
hardwareUsedBy
Indicates that a piece of hardware is utilized or operated by a particular entity (such as a person, system, or organization).
-
C.
usedInComputerFamily
chosen
Indicates that something (such as a component, technology, or design) is employed within or forms part of a particular family or line of computers.
-
D.
hardwareUsed
Indicates that a particular piece of hardware is utilized or employed in performing an action, process, or function involving another entity.
-
E.
isAmigaCompatible
Indicates that something is capable of operating with or supporting the hardware, software, or standards of the Amiga computer platform.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ee5b45873c81909499203612d05d07 |
completed | April 26, 2026, 6:36 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f60c6c9b808190812dcb252b9844f2 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 2:38 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f60b874cc88190a487230abb69efea |
completed | May 2, 2026, 2:34 p.m. |
Created at: April 26, 2026, 8:38 p.m.