Triple
T26164553
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Sir Creek dispute |
E654210
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasNegotiationFormat |
P180116
|
FINISHED |
| Object | bilateral talks |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: bilateral talks | Statement: [Sir Creek dispute, hasNegotiationFormat, bilateral talks]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasNegotiationFormat Context triple: [Sir Creek dispute, hasNegotiationFormat, bilateral talks]
-
A.
hasNegotiationHistory
Indicates that there has been one or more prior negotiation interactions or exchanges between the related entities.
-
B.
hasWorkingFormat
Indicates that one entity possesses or is associated with a functional or operational format of another entity.
-
C.
hasMatchFormat
Indicates that something (such as a game, event, or competition) is conducted according to a specified match format or structure.
-
D.
negotiatesProtocolUsing
Indicates that one entity establishes or conducts a negotiation process with another entity using a specified protocol as the communication or agreement mechanism.
-
E.
hasProtocol
Indicates that an entity uses, follows, or is governed by a specified protocol or set of procedural rules.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ee5b44391c81908bdbd8813ba9aa99 |
completed | April 26, 2026, 6:36 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f73223675481908c1bc3208c0f5284 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 11:31 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f7317690108190b3aae2cd2e1d069e |
completed | May 3, 2026, 11:28 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f73221eef88190bd8905e6e9f5a586 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 11:31 a.m. |
Created at: April 26, 2026, 8:32 p.m.