Triple
T26153900
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Judicial Committee of the House of Lords |
E659903
|
entity |
| Predicate | appealsHeardInPanelsOf |
P50258
|
FINISHED |
| Object | typically five Law Lords |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: typically five Law Lords | Statement: [Judicial Committee of the House of Lords, appealsHeardInPanelsOf, typically five Law Lords]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: appealsHeardInPanelsOf Context triple: [Judicial Committee of the House of Lords, appealsHeardInPanelsOf, typically five Law Lords]
-
A.
hearsCasesInPanelsOf
chosen
Indicates that a judicial body conducts its case hearings using panels composed of a specified number or configuration of judges.
-
B.
hearsAppealsBy
Indicates that one party has the authority or role to review and decide on appeals submitted by another party.
-
C.
hearsAppealsIn
Indicates that a judicial body has the authority to review and decide appeals within a specified jurisdiction or court.
-
D.
hearsAppealsAgainst
Indicates that one entity formally reviews and considers appeals challenging the decisions or actions of another entity.
-
E.
workedAsJudgeOn
Indicates that a person served in the role of a judge in connection with a particular case, court, or judicial proceeding.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ee5bc5a9908190899d39ce95c6d215 |
completed | April 26, 2026, 6:39 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f661b58ac48190907b6c6e9ccc2c59 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:42 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f660eea4648190b0d5e24293607813 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:39 p.m. |
Created at: April 26, 2026, 8:26 p.m.