Triple
T26153731
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mary Reeves |
E659898
|
entity |
| Predicate | curatedLegacyOf |
P16342
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Jim Reeves |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Jim Reeves | Statement: [Mary Reeves, curatedLegacyOf, Jim Reeves]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: curatedLegacyOf Context triple: [Mary Reeves, curatedLegacyOf, Jim Reeves]
-
A.
hasCulturalLegacyIn
Indicates that an entity has left a lasting cultural influence, impact, or heritage within a particular place, community, or cultural context.
-
B.
sharesHistoricalLegacyOf
Indicates that one entity is connected to, or participates in, the same historical legacy, tradition, or heritage as another entity.
-
C.
cultureLegacy
Indicates that one entity preserves, inherits, or is significantly shaped by the cultural traditions, values, or practices originating from another entity.
-
D.
retainsHeritageOf
chosen
Indicates that one entity preserves, maintains, or keeps alive the cultural, historical, or traditional legacy originating from another entity.
-
E.
combinesHeritageOf
Indicates a relationship where one entity integrates or unites the cultural, ancestral, or historical heritage of two or more other entities into a combined whole.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ee5bc5a9908190899d39ce95c6d215 |
completed | April 26, 2026, 6:39 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f60c0d35288190b016726366d3ad27 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 2:37 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f5b0021da88190bdd4cf2698c23edf |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:04 a.m. |
Created at: April 26, 2026, 8:26 p.m.