Triple

T2614733
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Pepé Le Pew E58859 entity
Predicate laterAppearancesIn P41450 FINISHED
Object television specials LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: television specials | Statement: [Pepé Le Pew, laterAppearancesIn, television specials]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: laterAppearancesIn
Context triple: [Pepé Le Pew, laterAppearancesIn, television specials]
  • A. laterAppearsOnNetwork
    Indicates that an entity is broadcast or becomes available on a specified network at a later time than some reference point or initial appearance.
  • B. appearedWith
    Indicates that two entities were present or participated together in the same context, event, or medium.
  • C. appearsFor
    Indicates that one entity is presented, shown, or made visible on behalf of, or in representation of, another entity.
  • D. laterFeaturedCastFrom
    Indicates that one entity appears as a featured cast member in a later work, episode, or installment relative to another entity.
  • E. laterDeployedIn
    Indicates that one entity was deployed or put into operation in a particular context, location, or system at a later time than another.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ab4ac444dc819099614e534dd6021f completed March 6, 2026, 9:44 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abd89325308190985598373eb0d296 completed March 7, 2026, 7:49 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abd80cd7fc81909e9696db2919129f completed March 7, 2026, 7:47 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69abd891bcd481909af5340a64ff69f9 completed March 7, 2026, 7:49 a.m.
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:50 p.m.