Triple

T26140336
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Thuraiyur E659497 entity
Predicate hasAgricultureType P137337 FINISHED
Object Paddy cultivation region LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Paddy cultivation region | Statement: [Thuraiyur, hasAgricultureType, Paddy cultivation region]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasAgricultureType
Context triple: [Thuraiyur, hasAgricultureType, Paddy cultivation region]
  • A. hasAgriculturalType chosen
    Indicates that an entity is associated with or classified by a specific type or category of agriculture.
  • B. hasAgriculturalCharacter
    Indicates that something possesses qualities, features, or uses typical of agriculture or farming activities.
  • C. hasAgriculturalProduction
    Indicates that an entity engages in or is characterized by the production of agricultural goods such as crops or livestock.
  • D. isCultivatedAs
    Indicates that one entity is intentionally grown, tended, or produced by another as a crop, resource, or cultivated organism.
  • E. hasAgriculturalModel
    Indicates that one entity possesses, uses, or is associated with a specific agricultural model (such as a framework, simulation, or methodology for agricultural processes).
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ee5bc3c20c8190bf2cf272f4170e95 completed April 26, 2026, 6:38 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f60be435b48190a389ebb5a4537a16 completed May 2, 2026, 2:36 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f5b0021da88190bdd4cf2698c23edf completed May 2, 2026, 8:04 a.m.
Created at: April 26, 2026, 8:19 p.m.