Triple

T26139663
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Brussels–Tournai railway line E659480 entity
Predicate formsCorridorTowards P80212 FINISHED
Object western Belgium NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: western Belgium | Statement: [Brussels–Tournai railway line, formsCorridorTowards, western Belgium]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: formsCorridorTowards
Context triple: [Brussels–Tournai railway line, formsCorridorTowards, western Belgium]
  • A. focusesOnCorridor
    Indicates that an action, attention, or process is directed specifically toward a corridor or passageway.
  • B. corridorFunction chosen
    Indicates that one entity serves as a corridor or passageway functionally connecting or providing access between other spaces or areas.
  • C. followedCorridor
    Indicates that an entity moved along and stayed within the path of a corridor from one point to another.
  • D. parallelCorridorFor
    Indicates that one corridor runs alongside and in the same general direction as another corridor, forming a parallel passage.
  • E. corridorOrientation
    Indicates the directional alignment or bearing of a corridor relative to a reference frame or coordinate system.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ee5bc3c20c8190bf2cf272f4170e95 completed April 26, 2026, 6:38 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f661b58ac48190907b6c6e9ccc2c59 completed May 2, 2026, 8:42 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f660eea4648190b0d5e24293607813 completed May 2, 2026, 8:39 p.m.
Created at: April 26, 2026, 8:19 p.m.