Triple

T26138107
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject منف E659435 entity
Predicate كانت_ترتبط_إداريًا_ب P37165 FINISHED
Object إقليم الجميز (الإقليم الأول من مصر السفلى) NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: إقليم الجميز (الإقليم الأول من مصر السفلى) | Statement: [منف, كانت_ترتبط_إداريًا_ب, إقليم الجميز (الإقليم الأول من مصر السفلى)]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: كانت_ترتبط_إداريًا_ب
Context triple: [منف, كانت_ترتبط_إداريًا_ب, إقليم الجميز (الإقليم الأول من مصر السفلى)]
  • A. associatedWithAdministration chosen
    Indicates a relationship in which an entity is connected to, involved in, or under the responsibility of an administrative body, process, or function.
  • B. usedToRelate
    Indicates that one entity previously had a relationship or association with another, but that relationship no longer holds in the present.
  • C. relatedTo
    Indicates a general, non-specific relationship or association exists between two entities.
  • D. associatedWithManager
    Indicates that an entity has a managerial connection or relationship with a specific manager.
  • E. relatedToTerm
    Indicates a general, non-specific relationship or association between one term and another.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ee5bc3c20c8190bf2cf272f4170e95 completed April 26, 2026, 6:38 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f63fd6c68481908c542aa03e297b9c completed May 2, 2026, 6:17 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f63c6456608190b94e7c2e2c2a4824 completed May 2, 2026, 6:03 p.m.
Created at: April 26, 2026, 8:18 p.m.