Triple
T26137475
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Feyli |
E659420
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasMorphologicalSimilarity |
P87414
|
FINISHED |
| Object | other Kurdish dialects |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: other Kurdish dialects | Statement: [Feyli, hasMorphologicalSimilarity, other Kurdish dialects]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasMorphologicalSimilarity Context triple: [Feyli, hasMorphologicalSimilarity, other Kurdish dialects]
-
A.
hasLexicalSimilarityWith
Indicates that two linguistic items share a significant degree of similarity in form, structure, or wording.
-
B.
hasGrammaticalSimilarityTo
Indicates that two linguistic elements share similar grammatical structure, form, or function.
-
C.
hasSimilarityTo
Indicates that one entity shares common characteristics, features, or qualities with another entity to a notable degree.
-
D.
hasPhonologicalSimilarityTo
Indicates that two linguistic elements share similar sound patterns or phonological features.
-
E.
morphologicalComparison
chosen
Indicates a relationship where two or more entities are compared based on differences or similarities in their morphological (form or structural) characteristics.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ee5bc3c20c8190bf2cf272f4170e95 |
completed | April 26, 2026, 6:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6b2a65c7c8190ac40f1466ceadefc |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:27 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6b14d7d508190bc7d4c89dfba4a32 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:22 a.m. |
Created at: April 26, 2026, 8:18 p.m.