Triple

T26135948
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Steve Farmer E659383 entity
Predicate positionOnIndusScript P173339 FINISHED
Object claims the Indus signs do not encode a natural language LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: claims the Indus signs do not encode a natural language | Statement: [Steve Farmer, positionOnIndusScript, claims the Indus signs do not encode a natural language]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: positionOnIndusScript
Context triple: [Steve Farmer, positionOnIndusScript, claims the Indus signs do not encode a natural language]
  • A. positionInGuruGranthSahib
    Indicates the specific location or ordering of a referenced element within the text of the Guru Granth Sahib.
  • B. positionInVeda
    Indicates the specific location or ordering of a referenced element within the structure of a Vedic text.
  • C. positionInSaptarishi
    Indicates the specific place or ordering that an entity occupies within the Saptarishi group.
  • D. positionInFuthark
    Indicates the relative ordering or index that something occupies within the Futhark sequence or system.
  • E. positionInDasamGranth
    Indicates the specific location or ordering of a referenced element within the text of the Dasam Granth.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ee5bc3c20c8190bf2cf272f4170e95 completed April 26, 2026, 6:38 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6b56ed31481908c3e5d749e46bad9 completed May 3, 2026, 2:39 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6b3a5fd8481909433e923c5e24e55 completed May 3, 2026, 2:32 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f6b49339048190b617a6749f648825 completed May 3, 2026, 2:36 a.m.
Created at: April 26, 2026, 8:17 p.m.