Triple
T26120257
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hatsuse River |
E658943
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasMotifInLiterature |
P41002
|
FINISHED |
| Object | flowing water |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: flowing water | Statement: [Hatsuse River, hasMotifInLiterature, flowing water]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasMotifInLiterature Context triple: [Hatsuse River, hasMotifInLiterature, flowing water]
-
A.
usesMotifsFrom
Indicates that one entity incorporates or draws upon recurring themes, patterns, or elements that originate from another entity.
-
B.
featuresMotif
chosen
Indicates that something contains, incorporates, or prominently includes a particular recurring motif or pattern.
-
C.
commonMotifRegion
Indicates that two or more entities share a recurring motif within the same spatial or contextual region.
-
D.
hasMirrorMotif
Indicates that one entity features a mirror-related motif or pattern in relation to another entity or context.
-
E.
transformationMotif
Indicates a recurring pattern or theme in which one entity undergoes a change in form, state, or identity in relation to another.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ee5bc2b2948190b458ad3f580af779 |
completed | April 26, 2026, 6:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6aaf50be08190a2b62a6d881f8aee |
completed | May 3, 2026, 1:55 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6aa1c555081908787dbf76147f180 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 1:51 a.m. |
Created at: April 26, 2026, 8:08 p.m.