Triple
T26114235
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Carlton Lassiter |
E658775
|
entity |
| Predicate | relationshipToShawnSpencer |
P195759
|
FINISHED |
| Object | professional rival |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: professional rival | Statement: [Carlton Lassiter, relationshipToShawnSpencer, professional rival]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipToShawnSpencer Context triple: [Carlton Lassiter, relationshipToShawnSpencer, professional rival]
-
A.
relationshipToJaneRizzoli
Indicates the specific familial, social, or professional relationship that one entity has to Jane Rizzoli.
-
B.
relationshipToSamanthaGrimm
Indicates the specific type of relationship or connection an entity has to Samantha Grimm.
-
C.
relationshipWithKateBeckett
Indicates that there exists a personal or professional relationship involving Kate Beckett and another entity.
-
D.
relationshipToRyanBingham
Indicates the specific type of personal or social relationship an entity has with Ryan Bingham.
-
E.
relationshipToEthanEdwards
Indicates the nature or type of connection, association, or bond that one entity has with Ethan Edwards.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ee5bc20298819099a42be042eb2349 |
completed | April 26, 2026, 6:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fde5d7d9548190880a9d95b8f0f66b |
completed | May 8, 2026, 1:32 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fde4e1bf9c81909754545275eccc03 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 1:28 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fde5d677b88190bc904e6df8617c18 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 1:32 p.m. |
Created at: April 26, 2026, 8:04 p.m.