Triple

T26108375
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject A51 E658601 entity
Predicate notTypicallyShownTo P159958 FINISHED
Object general public LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: general public | Statement: [A51, notTypicallyShownTo, general public]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: notTypicallyShownTo
Context triple: [A51, notTypicallyShownTo, general public]
  • A. notTypically
    Indicates that the referenced situation, behavior, or relationship does not usually or normally occur under standard or expected conditions.
  • B. cannotShow
    Indicates that one entity is unable or not permitted to display, reveal, or present another entity.
  • C. notVisibleWhen
    Indicates that one entity is not visible whenever a specified condition, state, or context involving another entity holds.
  • D. notObservedIn
    Indicates that a particular entity, event, or property has not been detected, recorded, or seen within a specified context, dataset, or environment.
  • E. notTypicallyUsedFor
    Indicates that something is generally not used for a particular purpose, function, or activity under normal circumstances.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ee5bc09c288190bc42a11972841383 completed April 26, 2026, 6:38 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f60779ae4c81909428c6d249cc0665 completed May 2, 2026, 2:17 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f5b0021da88190bdd4cf2698c23edf completed May 2, 2026, 8:04 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f5f6b32a8881909baa0db57b80d56a completed May 2, 2026, 1:05 p.m.
Created at: April 26, 2026, 8 p.m.