Triple
T26095670
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Nubian Dynasty |
E658257
|
entity |
| Predicate | lastPharaoh |
P159936
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Tantamani |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Tantamani | Statement: [Nubian Dynasty, lastPharaoh, Tantamani]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: lastPharaoh Context triple: [Nubian Dynasty, lastPharaoh, Tantamani]
-
A.
lastNativePharaohBefore
Indicates that one person was the final pharaoh of native origin to rule before another specified ruler or ruling group took power.
-
B.
majorPharaoh
Indicates that the subject is recognized as a principal or highly significant pharaoh in relation to the object (such as a period, dynasty, or context).
-
C.
motherOfPharaoh
Indicates that one entity is the mother (biological or adoptive) of another entity who holds the title or role of pharaoh.
-
D.
pharaohOfBuilder
Indicates a relationship where a pharaoh is the ruler under whose authority or during whose reign a particular structure or monument was built.
-
E.
associatedWithPharaoh
Indicates a relationship in which an entity has a connection, link, or involvement with a pharaoh, such as through service, rule, influence, or historical association.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ee5bbfc4d08190a1b206d0ac3a1e8d |
completed | April 26, 2026, 6:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f60735fddc8190a21af7b48e45b9be |
completed | May 2, 2026, 2:16 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f5b0021da88190bdd4cf2698c23edf |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:04 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f5f6b32a8881909baa0db57b80d56a |
completed | May 2, 2026, 1:05 p.m. |
Created at: April 26, 2026, 7:50 p.m.