Triple

T26088733
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Regenerating Degenerate E658058 entity
Predicate emphasizesTone P49759 FINISHED
Object comedic LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: comedic | Statement: [Regenerating Degenerate, emphasizesTone, comedic]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: emphasizesTone
Context triple: [Regenerating Degenerate, emphasizesTone, comedic]
  • A. hasEmphasis
    Indicates that one element is given special stress, importance, or prominence relative to others.
  • B. emphasizesConsonanceOf
    Indicates that one entity highlights, stresses, or draws attention to the harmony, agreement, or consonant relationship between itself and another entity.
  • C. contributesToTone chosen
    Indicates that one entity plays a role in shaping, influencing, or determining the overall tone or mood of another entity.
  • D. normativelyEmphasizes
    Indicates that one entity highlights, prioritizes, or stresses another entity as a standard, value, or principle that ought to be followed or given special importance.
  • E. leadingTone
    Indicates that one musical pitch functions as a leading tone, creating a strong tendency to resolve stepwise (typically upward) to a specific target pitch.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ee5bbfc4d08190a1b206d0ac3a1e8d completed April 26, 2026, 6:38 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f60c698ae48190871cd445422bad91 completed May 2, 2026, 2:38 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f60b874cc88190a487230abb69efea completed May 2, 2026, 2:34 p.m.
Created at: April 26, 2026, 7:45 p.m.