Triple
T26086988
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Colonel Creighton |
E658009
|
entity |
| Predicate | commandsInFiction |
P129178
|
FINISHED |
| Object | intelligence network in northern India |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: intelligence network in northern India | Statement: [Colonel Creighton, commandsInFiction, intelligence network in northern India]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: commandsInFiction Context triple: [Colonel Creighton, commandsInFiction, intelligence network in northern India]
-
A.
commandStructureInFiction
chosen
Indicates a hierarchical command or authority relationship that exists between characters or groups within a fictional setting.
-
B.
createsInFiction
Indicates that one entity is the creator or originator of another entity within a fictional or narrative context.
-
C.
conductsInFiction
Indicates that an entity carries out or performs an action or role within a fictional context or narrative.
-
D.
commandPhraseInStory
Indicates that a specific command phrase appears within the narrative content of a story.
-
E.
worksInFictionalContext
Indicates that an entity performs work or fulfills a role within a fictional or imagined setting rather than in real-world circumstances.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ee5bbf0d208190801ee95d4f07fb16 |
completed | April 26, 2026, 6:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6430a93a48190854ce71df680b2fa |
completed | May 2, 2026, 6:31 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f641da05b881909f6283c988639c53 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 6:26 p.m. |
Created at: April 26, 2026, 7:43 p.m.