Triple

T26076007
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Meta E657679 entity
Predicate mentionedInTraditionOf P160329 FINISHED
Object myth of Aegeus LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: myth of Aegeus | Statement: [Meta, mentionedInTraditionOf, myth of Aegeus]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: mentionedInTraditionOf
Context triple: [Meta, mentionedInTraditionOf, myth of Aegeus]
  • A. foundedInTradition
    Indicates that something is established, developed, or grounded within a particular tradition or set of longstanding customary practices.
  • B. hasUseInTradition
    Indicates that something is employed or holds a functional role within a particular cultural, religious, or historical tradition.
  • C. equatedWithInSomeTraditions
    Indicates that, in certain cultural, religious, or scholarly traditions, one entity is regarded as equivalent to or identified with another.
  • D. traditionInheritedFrom
    Indicates that a tradition has been passed down or derived from an earlier source, group, or culture.
  • E. hasPartInSomeTraditions
    Indicates that something is considered a component or element of another thing within at least some cultural, religious, or historical traditions, but not necessarily in all contexts.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ee5bbe539081909efc7f9dd7c1b53c completed April 26, 2026, 6:38 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f606cf938c8190aa96a095c824367e completed May 2, 2026, 2:14 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f5f7fba5248190945acf1561280799 completed May 2, 2026, 1:11 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f600be0de88190989611e952b03117 completed May 2, 2026, 1:48 p.m.
Created at: April 26, 2026, 7:34 p.m.