Triple
T26066387
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | De tempore |
E657413
|
entity |
| Predicate | reflectsMethod |
P132030
|
FINISHED |
| Object | logical analysis of doctrine |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: logical analysis of doctrine | Statement: [De tempore, reflectsMethod, logical analysis of doctrine]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: reflectsMethod Context triple: [De tempore, reflectsMethod, logical analysis of doctrine]
-
A.
followsMethod
Indicates that one method or procedure is carried out in accordance with, or as a consequence of, another specified method.
-
B.
implementsMethod
Indicates that one entity provides a concrete implementation of a specified method defined or required elsewhere.
-
C.
hasReflectionFormula
Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific formula or expression used to compute its reflection (e.g., across a line, plane, or axis).
-
D.
specifiesMethod
chosen
Indicates that one entity defines or designates the particular method or procedure by which another entity operates or is carried out.
-
E.
reflects
Indicates that one entity (often a surface, medium, or representation) throws back, mirrors, or otherwise shows an image, property, or state of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ee5bbe539081909efc7f9dd7c1b53c |
completed | April 26, 2026, 6:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6352fdb788190b9bad30243690743 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 5:32 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f63182f1408190bddc1214fcbd6145 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 5:16 p.m. |
Created at: April 26, 2026, 7:24 p.m.