Triple
T26061121
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ben-Ammi |
E657264
|
entity |
| Predicate | languageOfDescendants |
P89065
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Ammonite language |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Ammonite language | Statement: [Ben-Ammi, languageOfDescendants, Ammonite language]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: languageOfDescendants Context triple: [Ben-Ammi, languageOfDescendants, Ammonite language]
-
A.
linguisticDescendant
chosen
Indicates that one language is historically derived from, or has evolved out of, another language.
-
B.
ethnicGroupLanguageOf
Indicates that a particular language is spoken by, associated with, or characteristic of a given ethnic group.
-
C.
ethnicLanguageStatus
Indicates the status or role of a language in relation to a particular ethnic group (e.g., primary, secondary, heritage, or minority language).
-
D.
demographicsSignificantLanguage
Indicates that a particular language is significantly represented or prevalent within the demographic profile of a population or group.
-
E.
modernLanguageDescendant
Indicates that one language is a direct or indirect descendant of another language in the modern era.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ee5bbd788481909e22bd7153d0c037 |
completed | April 26, 2026, 6:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f78c61ed4c8190ad84c918fa9af55a |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:56 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f78b8cb3a881909ebaac1b503988c2 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:53 p.m. |
Created at: April 26, 2026, 7:17 p.m.