Triple
T26057460
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mainland Surigaonon |
E657159
|
entity |
| Predicate | primaryVarietyOf |
P143417
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Surigaonon language |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Surigaonon language | Statement: [Mainland Surigaonon, primaryVarietyOf, Surigaonon language]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: primaryVarietyOf Context triple: [Mainland Surigaonon, primaryVarietyOf, Surigaonon language]
-
A.
isPrimaryVarietyOf
chosen
Indicates that one variety is the main or principal form of another related variety or entity.
-
B.
parentVariety
Indicates that one variety is the direct parent or source variety from which another variety is derived or developed.
-
C.
primaryVariant
Indicates that one entity is the main or canonical version among multiple related variants of another entity.
-
D.
primaryWhiteVariety
Indicates that one entity is the primary white (light-skinned or white-colored) variety or form of another entity.
-
E.
primaryVariants
Indicates that one entity is a primary or canonical variant of another, typically within a set of related or alternative forms.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ee5bbd788481909e22bd7153d0c037 |
completed | April 26, 2026, 6:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fd4d1854988190be093b103a681798 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 2:40 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fd4c8d1a188190897c24527337814a |
completed | May 8, 2026, 2:38 a.m. |
Created at: April 26, 2026, 7:12 p.m.