Triple
T26038104
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Paris Court of Appeal |
E647608
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasFunction |
P88
|
FINISHED |
| Object | review and adjudicate appeals from lower courts |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: review and adjudicate appeals from lower courts | Statement: [Paris Court of Appeal, hasFunction, review and adjudicate appeals from lower courts]
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e77e8c88f08190858c4c81bd2e1b9a |
completed | April 21, 2026, 1:41 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6061fd954819082000e723287e423 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 2:11 p.m. |
Created at: April 22, 2026, 9:08 a.m.