Triple
T26032726
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Chill |
E647476
|
entity |
| Predicate | developerOfContainingGame |
P163861
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Nintendo R&D1 |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Nintendo R&D1 | Statement: [Chill, developerOfContainingGame, Nintendo R&D1]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: developerOfContainingGame Context triple: [Chill, developerOfContainingGame, Nintendo R&D1]
-
A.
gameDeveloper
Indicates that one entity creates, designs, or develops the other entity, which is a game.
-
B.
developerOfGameUsed
Indicates that an entity is the developer of a game that is (or was) used or played in a given context.
-
C.
developerOfGameAppearance
Indicates that an entity is the developer responsible for creating or producing a particular appearance or version of a game.
-
D.
gameDeveloperOfAppearance
Indicates that an entity is the developer responsible for creating or producing a particular appearance or version of a game.
-
E.
laterDeveloper
Indicates that one developer’s work, role, or involvement occurs after another developer in time.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e77e8b60e88190a3b26c4f0032a2c2 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 1:41 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6416fbf4081909b0913c337927fc4 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 6:24 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f63c6456608190b94e7c2e2c2a4824 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 6:03 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f63fd4f7448190930c723ba7cfce62 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 6:17 p.m. |
Created at: April 22, 2026, 9:06 a.m.