Triple
T26007028
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Socket AM3 |
E646786
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasRetentionModuleCompatibility |
P192968
|
FINISHED |
| Object | same as Socket AM2 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: same as Socket AM2 | Statement: [Socket AM3, hasRetentionModuleCompatibility, same as Socket AM2]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasRetentionModuleCompatibility Context triple: [Socket AM3, hasRetentionModuleCompatibility, same as Socket AM2]
-
A.
hasCompatibilityMode
Indicates that one entity operates under a special mode or setting designed to maintain compatibility with another entity or with an earlier version.
-
B.
checksCompatibilityWith
Indicates that one entity evaluates whether it is compatible or can function harmoniously with another entity.
-
C.
canRetain
Indicates that one entity has the ability or permission to keep, hold, or maintain possession or control of another entity over time.
-
D.
enablesCompatibilityWith
Indicates that one entity provides the necessary features or conditions for another entity to function correctly or be compatible with a specified system, standard, or component.
-
E.
compatibilityModel
Indicates that one entity is defined or evaluated according to a specific compatibility framework, standard, or model in relation to another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e77e89d5848190b54352cdb74f6029 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 1:41 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fd35d108908190b79b1e8e6bbd62aa |
completed | May 8, 2026, 1:01 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fd34cb46108190b43c3b7f67ec4cd4 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 12:56 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fd35d029588190a525aa8a506e7708 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 1:01 a.m. |
Created at: April 22, 2026, 9:01 a.m.