Triple
T259954
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | USS West Virginia (BB-48) |
E5518
|
entity |
| Predicate | modernizationFeatures |
P10292
|
FINISHED |
| Object | new superstructure |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: new superstructure | Statement: [USS West Virginia (BB-48), modernizationFeatures, new superstructure]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: modernizationFeatures Context triple: [USS West Virginia (BB-48), modernizationFeatures, new superstructure]
-
A.
modernization
Indicates a process by which something is updated, reformed, or transformed to align with contemporary standards, technologies, or practices.
-
B.
modernUse
Indicates how something is currently used or applied in modern times.
-
C.
typicalFeatures
Indicates that the related entities are characteristic or commonly occurring features or attributes of something.
-
D.
technologicalFeature
Indicates that one entity possesses, exhibits, or is characterized by a specific technological capability, component, or functionality in relation to another entity.
-
E.
featuresText
Indicates that an entity includes or presents a specific piece of text as one of its characteristics or contents.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2580a64ac8190ad76e34bb0715b5e |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:50 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a25f921c2881908821ca2c03815eae |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 3:22 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a25b6b3ea88190bbd858999e42efae |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 3:05 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a25f9163f881909232f8aea502cf80 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 3:22 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:55 a.m.