Triple

T259856
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Smoot–Hawley Tariff Act E5516 entity
Predicate usedAsExampleOf P2506 FINISHED
Object dangers of protectionism in economic literature LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: dangers of protectionism in economic literature | Statement: [Smoot–Hawley Tariff Act, usedAsExampleOf, dangers of protectionism in economic literature]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usedAsExampleOf
Context triple: [Smoot–Hawley Tariff Act, usedAsExampleOf, dangers of protectionism in economic literature]
  • A. usedToExplain
    Indicates that one entity serves as an explanation or clarification for another entity.
  • B. alsoUsedIn
    Indicates that something is additionally employed, applied, or present in another context, setting, or use case beyond the primary one.
  • C. isUsedAs chosen
    Indicates that one entity serves a particular function, role, or purpose as another entity.
  • D. usedFor
    Indicates that one entity serves a purpose, function, or role in accomplishing, enabling, or supporting another entity or activity.
  • E. usedWith
    Indicates that one entity is typically or appropriately employed together with another entity in a combined or complementary use.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a2580a64ac8190ad76e34bb0715b5e completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:50 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a25f921c2881908821ca2c03815eae completed Feb. 28, 2026, 3:22 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a25b6b3ea88190bbd858999e42efae completed Feb. 28, 2026, 3:05 a.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:55 a.m.