Triple
T2596593
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Elowah Falls |
E58245
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasBridgeBelow |
P19223
|
FINISHED |
| Object | footbridge across McCord Creek |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: footbridge across McCord Creek | Statement: [Elowah Falls, hasBridgeBelow, footbridge across McCord Creek]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasBridgeBelow Context triple: [Elowah Falls, hasBridgeBelow, footbridge across McCord Creek]
-
A.
hasBridgeTo
Indicates that one entity is connected to another by a bridge or bridging structure that allows passage or linkage between them.
-
B.
hasNearbyBridge
chosen
Indicates that one entity is located close to a bridge associated with or relevant to it.
-
C.
hasBridgeSection
Indicates that one entity includes or is associated with a specific bridge section as a distinct part or component.
-
D.
hasFootbridge
Indicates that there exists a footbridge providing a pedestrian connection between the related entities.
-
E.
hasBridgeTypeCrossing
Indicates that a bridge is characterized by a specific type of crossing it provides or supports.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ab4ac14040819098b13f4a27d5c8ff |
completed | March 6, 2026, 9:44 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abd42b3cd4819093b2cab78de1f66c |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:30 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abd0d344988190a18dd93b13e002e6 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:16 a.m. |
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:49 p.m.