Triple

T2596376
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Tontola E58239 entity
Predicate hasSecondarySubdivisionType P36805 FINISHED
Object province LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: province | Statement: [Tontola, hasSecondarySubdivisionType, province]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasSecondarySubdivisionType
Context triple: [Tontola, hasSecondarySubdivisionType, province]
  • A. hasSubdivision
    Indicates that one entity is divided into and contains another entity as one of its constituent parts or administrative units.
  • B. hasHigherLevelSubdivision
    Indicates that one administrative or organizational unit is contained within and subordinate to a larger, higher-level subdivision.
  • C. hasSubdivisionCode
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific code identifying one of its internal subdivisions (such as a state, province, or region).
  • D. hasTypeOfSubdivision chosen
    Indicates that one administrative or territorial unit is classified as a specific kind or category of subdivision.
  • E. formerSubdivisionOf
    Indicates that an entity once functioned as an administrative or territorial part of another entity but no longer holds that status.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ab4ac14040819098b13f4a27d5c8ff completed March 6, 2026, 9:44 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abd42b3cd4819093b2cab78de1f66c completed March 7, 2026, 7:30 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abd0d344988190a18dd93b13e002e6 completed March 7, 2026, 7:16 a.m.
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:49 p.m.