Triple
T25956181
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Perinçek v. Switzerland |
E654106
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | freedom of expression case |
C11038
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: freedom of expression case Context triple: [Perinçek v. Switzerland, instanceOf, freedom of expression case]
-
A.
free speech case
chosen
A free speech case is a legal dispute that centers on whether an individual’s or group’s expression is protected under constitutional or statutory guarantees of freedom of speech.
-
B.
freedom of expression law
Freedom of expression law is the body of legal rules and principles that define, protect, and limit individuals’ rights to express ideas, opinions, and information through various forms of communication.
-
C.
press freedom case
A press freedom case is a legal dispute or proceeding that centers on the rights, limits, or protections of journalists and media organizations in gathering, publishing, or distributing information.
-
D.
freedom of religion case
A freedom of religion case is a legal dispute in which a party claims that government action or law has infringed upon their right to hold, express, or practice religious beliefs.
-
E.
press freedom theory
Press freedom theory examines the principles, conditions, and normative justifications that enable an independent, pluralistic, and accountable media to operate free from undue governmental, corporate, or social control.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e7ab40ac788190a771bc499eb1ae5f |
completed | April 21, 2026, 4:52 p.m. |
Created at: April 22, 2026, 8:45 a.m.