Triple

T25952062
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Trevor Key E653987 entity
Predicate notableForVisualStyle P46274 FINISHED
Object use of constructed photographic objects LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: use of constructed photographic objects | Statement: [Trevor Key, notableForVisualStyle, use of constructed photographic objects]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: notableForVisualStyle
Context triple: [Trevor Key, notableForVisualStyle, use of constructed photographic objects]
  • A. notableStyleFeature chosen
    Indicates that an entity possesses a distinctive stylistic characteristic or design element that is especially noteworthy or defining.
  • B. notableColor
    Indicates that an entity is characteristically or prominently associated with a particular color.
  • C. notableSubstyle
    Indicates that one style is a notable or distinct subcategory within another broader style.
  • D. notableStyleRegion
    Indicates that a particular style, manner, or artistic approach is especially characteristic of or prominent within a specific geographic region.
  • E. notableDisplay
    Indicates that something is prominently or distinctively presented in a way that draws special attention or recognition.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e7ab40ac788190a771bc499eb1ae5f completed April 21, 2026, 4:52 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fddd373cdc8190be1b12e70e4deb1f completed May 8, 2026, 12:55 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fddc6915a88190ad41e379aa3ede13 completed May 8, 2026, 12:51 p.m.
Created at: April 22, 2026, 8:44 a.m.