Triple

T25942770
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Suzanne Verdal E653750 entity
Predicate metLeonardCohenIn P159585 FINISHED
Object Montreal NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Montreal | Statement: [Suzanne Verdal, metLeonardCohenIn, Montreal]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: metLeonardCohenIn
Context triple: [Suzanne Verdal, metLeonardCohenIn, Montreal]
  • A. lyricallyPairedWith
    Indicates that two musical or poetic elements are intentionally matched or combined in lyrics, such as being written to accompany each other or to form a complementary lyrical pair.
  • B. الملحن
    Indicates that an entity is the composer or creator of a musical work for another entity (such as a song, piece, or performance).
  • C. singsAbout
    Indicates that one entity performs a song whose subject or theme is another entity.
  • D. hasWrittenLyricsFor
    Indicates that one entity is the lyricist who has created the words for a song or musical work performed or associated with another entity.
  • E. hasSongAbout
    Indicates that one entity has created, features, or is associated with a song whose subject or theme is about another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e7ab3fd2f881908837305e4ba98011 completed April 21, 2026, 4:52 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6045ec5708190917d60774389e68c completed May 2, 2026, 2:04 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f4a10480748190a2e67bd399fc435d completed May 1, 2026, 12:48 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f55e497fa081909bc59a7b92c5df59 completed May 2, 2026, 2:15 a.m.
Created at: April 22, 2026, 8:41 a.m.