Triple

T25930033
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Wythoff Nim E653413 entity
Predicate hasGoldenRatioValue P112553 FINISHED
Object (1 + √5) / 2 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: (1 + √5) / 2 | Statement: [Wythoff Nim, hasGoldenRatioValue, (1 + √5) / 2]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasGoldenRatioValue
Context triple: [Wythoff Nim, hasGoldenRatioValue, (1 + √5) / 2]
  • A. hasSymbolForGoldenRatio
    Indicates that one entity serves as the symbolic representation or notation used to denote the golden ratio for the other entity.
  • B. ratioToGold
    Indicates the proportional relationship between a given quantity and a corresponding amount of gold.
  • C. definedGoldSilverRatio
    Indicates that an entity has established or specified a particular exchange rate or proportional relationship between gold and silver.
  • D. isProportionalTo
    Indicates that one quantity varies in constant ratio to another, so when one changes, the other changes by a fixed multiplicative factor.
  • E. isLimitOfRatioOfConsecutiveTerms chosen
    Indicates that one quantity is the limit of the ratio formed by dividing each term in a sequence by its immediately preceding term.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e7ab3eb9b881909c1390690551f868 completed April 21, 2026, 4:52 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f60c698ae48190871cd445422bad91 completed May 2, 2026, 2:38 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f60b874cc88190a487230abb69efea completed May 2, 2026, 2:34 p.m.
Created at: April 22, 2026, 8:36 a.m.