Triple
T25930032
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Wythoff Nim |
E653413
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasSymbolForGoldenRatio |
P159843
|
FINISHED |
| Object | φ |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: φ | Statement: [Wythoff Nim, hasSymbolForGoldenRatio, φ]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasSymbolForGoldenRatio Context triple: [Wythoff Nim, hasSymbolForGoldenRatio, φ]
-
A.
definedGoldSilverRatio
Indicates that an entity has established or specified a particular exchange rate or proportional relationship between gold and silver.
-
B.
hasWythoffSymbol
Indicates that something is associated with, or characterized by, a specific Wythoff symbol describing its construction or symmetry in geometric terms.
-
C.
ratioToGold
Indicates the proportional relationship between a given quantity and a corresponding amount of gold.
-
D.
hasSymbolicForm
Indicates that one entity serves as the symbolic representation or abstract form of another entity.
-
E.
isLimitOfRatioOfConsecutiveTerms
Indicates that one quantity is the limit of the ratio formed by dividing each term in a sequence by its immediately preceding term.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e7ab3eb9b881909c1390690551f868 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 4:52 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f60418322081908411c24d1dc820de |
completed | May 2, 2026, 2:03 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f5afec3e94819080d9ba86cf8c866e |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:03 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f5f6b32a8881909baa0db57b80d56a |
completed | May 2, 2026, 1:05 p.m. |
Created at: April 22, 2026, 8:36 a.m.