Triple
T25929659
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hopkinsville Goblins incident of 1955 |
E653400
|
entity |
| Predicate | skepticalExplanation |
P114721
|
FINISHED |
| Object | misidentification of great horned owls |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: misidentification of great horned owls | Statement: [Hopkinsville Goblins incident of 1955, skepticalExplanation, misidentification of great horned owls]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: skepticalExplanation Context triple: [Hopkinsville Goblins incident of 1955, skepticalExplanation, misidentification of great horned owls]
-
A.
questionedFact
Indicates that one entity has asked about or challenged the truth, accuracy, or validity of a particular fact associated with another entity.
-
B.
claimsToExplain
Indicates that one entity asserts it can provide a clarification, account, or understanding of another entity or phenomenon.
-
C.
consideredByScience
Indicates that something is regarded, evaluated, or treated as valid or relevant within the framework, methods, or consensus of scientific inquiry.
-
D.
aimsToExplain
Indicates that one entity intends to clarify, make understandable, or provide an explanation about another entity, concept, or situation.
-
E.
debunkedBy
chosen
Indicates that a claim, idea, or assertion has been shown to be false or misleading by another party through evidence or argument.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e7ab3eb9b881909c1390690551f868 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 4:52 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6041710b481909f9583a3bbe16475 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 2:03 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f4a10480748190a2e67bd399fc435d |
completed | May 1, 2026, 12:48 p.m. |
Created at: April 22, 2026, 8:36 a.m.