Triple
T2590243
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Dawn Wall |
E58102
|
entity |
| Predicate | approachStyle |
P40578
|
FINISHED |
| Object | multi-day ascent with portaledges |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: multi-day ascent with portaledges | Statement: [The Dawn Wall, approachStyle, multi-day ascent with portaledges]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: approachStyle Context triple: [The Dawn Wall, approachStyle, multi-day ascent with portaledges]
-
A.
styleTendsTo
Indicates that one style is generally inclined or likely to develop, appear, or be adopted in the direction of another style.
-
B.
approachDirection
Indicates the direction or bearing from which one entity moves closer to or advances toward another entity.
-
C.
endingStyle
Indicates the manner or stylistic form in which something concludes or is brought to an end.
-
D.
structuralStyle
Indicates the architectural or design style that characterizes the structure or form of an entity.
-
E.
protocolStyle
Indicates the manner or format in which a protocol or communication procedure is structured or expressed.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ab4ac019c8819094add11c46706e32 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 9:44 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abd3feb45c81909369a49c3990294a |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:30 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abd0d19308819089ee942513d567a4 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:16 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69abd37ef248819090ab6b86b67e355f |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:27 a.m. |
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:49 p.m.