Triple
T25897108
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | UK Parliament 1987–2001 |
E652496
|
entity |
| Predicate | partyOfGovernment |
P42585
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Labour Party (UK) |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Labour Party (UK) | Statement: [UK Parliament 1987–2001, partyOfGovernment, Labour Party (UK)]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: partyOfGovernment Context triple: [UK Parliament 1987–2001, partyOfGovernment, Labour Party (UK)]
-
A.
politicalPartyOfGovernment
Indicates that a specified political party is the one currently forming or leading the government of a given jurisdiction.
-
B.
governingPartyOfState
chosen
Indicates that a particular political party holds the primary governing authority over a given state.
-
C.
politicalParty
Indicates that an entity is affiliated with, belongs to, or is a member of a specific political party.
-
D.
otherParliamentaryParty
Indicates that two political entities are distinct parliamentary parties within the same parliamentary context or system.
-
E.
partyOfCandidate
Indicates the political party with which a given candidate is affiliated.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e7ab3c6cc081908de59bfcc28ec19d |
completed | April 21, 2026, 4:52 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f603856d5081909db825186c4de49e |
completed | May 2, 2026, 2 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f5afec3e94819080d9ba86cf8c866e |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:03 a.m. |
Created at: April 22, 2026, 8:23 a.m.