Triple
T25892497
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Aitor Karanka |
E652372
|
entity |
| Predicate | signedAsManagerBy |
P160299
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Nottingham Forest FC |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Nottingham Forest FC | Statement: [Aitor Karanka, signedAsManagerBy, Nottingham Forest FC]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: signedAsManagerBy Context triple: [Aitor Karanka, signedAsManagerBy, Nottingham Forest FC]
-
A.
signedAsManagerBy
chosen
Indicates that something (such as a document or agreement) has been signed by a person specifically in their capacity or role as a manager.
-
B.
signedByManager
Indicates that a document, agreement, or record has been formally signed or approved by a manager.
-
C.
signedAs
Indicates that an entity has signed or endorsed something using a particular name, role, or identity.
-
D.
signedByRepresentativeOf
Indicates that an item (such as a document or agreement) has been signed on behalf of a party by that party’s authorized representative.
-
E.
agreementSignedBy
Indicates that a particular agreement has been formally signed or executed by a specified party.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e7ab3c6cc081908de59bfcc28ec19d |
completed | April 21, 2026, 4:52 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f603bb02288190b40cedbed5b9651d |
completed | May 2, 2026, 2:01 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f602d07590819085ac34b189613104 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 1:57 p.m. |
Created at: April 22, 2026, 8:22 a.m.