Triple
T25884760
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | PRYJ |
E652155
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasIATAFunction |
P159541
|
FINISHED |
| Object | false |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: false | Statement: [PRYJ, hasIATAFunction, false]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasIATAFunction Context triple: [PRYJ, hasIATAFunction, false]
-
A.
hasIATAcode
Indicates that an entity, typically a transportation facility like an airport, is associated with a specific IATA (International Air Transport Association) code.
-
B.
hasIATAStyle
Indicates that one entity uses or conforms to the IATA (International Air Transport Association) style or formatting standard associated with another entity.
-
C.
hasIATAFlightNumber
Indicates that an entity (typically a flight) is associated with a specific IATA-designated flight number.
-
D.
hasIATAIndustryCode
Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific IATA industry code that classifies its role or function in the air transport industry.
-
E.
hasIataAirportCodeContext
Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific IATA airport code within a particular contextual scope or usage.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e7ab3b92cc81908febd90317862647 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 4:52 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f603421d68819094435264277cf1bc |
completed | May 2, 2026, 1:59 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f4a0fed15881909b789251fe5d8d45 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 12:47 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f55e497fa081909bc59a7b92c5df59 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 2:15 a.m. |
Created at: April 22, 2026, 8:17 a.m.